Introduction
The Certified Technical Program Manager – AI & Agentic Systems (CTPM-AI®) examination assesses competence across three core areas that are essential to the role of a Technical Program Manager leading GenAI and agentic AI initiatives. CTPM-AI is the AI specialization within the CTPM® certification family: it applies the same discipline structure as the CTPM examination — Technology, Program Management, and People — specialized for programs in which AI systems reason, use tools, and take bounded actions inside enterprise workflows. This blueprint serves as a guide for certification candidates to understand the structure, key topics, and competency areas.
Certification Content Outline
The CTPM-AI® examination includes questions from each of the following disciplines, with associated weightings:

Technology (44%)

Program Management (33%)

People (23%)

Discipline Definitions

Discipline Definitions
Discipline Definitions
Discipline Definitions

Technology

Focuses on the technical foundation needed to lead AI and agentic programs, covering GenAI system fundamentals, agentic architecture, the agent interoperability stack (MCP, A2A, Agent Skills), enterprise platform evaluation, agent security and identity, and evaluation and observability.

Program Management

Encompasses the processes and methods essential for scoping, planning, governing, and measuring AI initiatives — including use-case selection, stage-gate governance, AI-specific risk and vendor management, regulatory compliance, and value measurement.

People

Addresses the leadership, translation, and adoption skills required to carry AI programs across product, engineering, security, legal, and executive stakeholders, and to lead teams through the workforce changes that agentic systems introduce.

Tier Definitions

Actions

Specific, measurable actions demonstrating competence within each responsibility.

Responsibilities

Core tasks that define each discipline.

Disciplines

High-level knowledge areas essential for the practice of technical program management in AI and agentic systems.

Actions

Specific, measurable actions demonstrating competence within each responsibility. 

Responsibilities

Core tasks that define each discipline.

Disciplines

High-level knowledge areas essential for the practice of technical program management.

CTPM-AI Blueprint by Discipline
Discipline 1: Technology (44%)
Responsibility Actions

1. GenAI System Fundamentals

– Explain how foundation and reasoning models work, including tokens, context windows, and inference.
– Assess capability, latency, and cost trade-offs across model classes, including extended thinking.

2. Retrieval and Grounding Architecture

– Design retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and grounding approaches for enterprise data.
– Evaluate data readiness for agents, including quality, permissions-aware retrieval, and knowledge lifecycle.

3. Context Engineering and Memory

– Define context strategies spanning system prompts, retrieved context, and tool results.
– Manage memory and compaction approaches for long-running agents and workflows.

4. Enterprise GenAI Reference
Architecture

– Sketch reference architectures covering channels, orchestration, models, tools, data, and guardrails.
– Identify observability, evaluation, and guardrail components required for production readiness.

5. Agentic System Design

– Distinguish prompted responses, workflows, single agents, and multi-agent systems — including when not to use agents.
– Design agent loops with goals, tools, policies, and bounded autonomy under the principle of least agency.

6. Workflow Control and Human
Oversight

– Design human-in-the-loop checkpoints and approval gates for agent actions.
– Plan failure handling for runaway loops, over-delegation, and cascading failures across connected agents.

7. Tool and Data Connectivity (MCP)

– Specify agent-to-tool and agent-to-data connectivity using the Model Context Protocol.
– Vet MCP servers and connectors as governed supply-chain components.

8. Agent Interoperability and Skills (A2A,
Agent Skills)

– Map cross-vendor agent collaboration using the Agent2Agent protocol.
– Package and govern procedural knowledge as portable agent skills.

9. Enterprise Platform Evaluation

– Compare the major enterprise agent ecosystems at a capability and governance level.
– Assess protocol support, exit costs, and vendor deprecation risk in platform selection.

10. Agent Security Management

– Threat-model agentic systems against leading agentic threat categories, including goal hijack and indirect prompt injection.
– Define mitigations for memory poisoning, tool compromise, and rogue-agent scenarios.

11. Agent Identity and Access
Management

– Specify authentication, least-privilege access, and lifecycle governance for agent identities.
– Design agent inventory, containment, and kill-switch patterns to manage agent sprawl.

12. Code-Centric and Computer-Use
Agents

– Evaluate agent harnesses, subagents, sandboxed execution, and browser or computer-use agents.
– Position code and computer-use agents appropriately within the SDLC and knowledge work.

13. Evaluation and Observability

– Define evaluation criteria before building, including quality, safety, and drift measures.
– Implement tracing, monitoring, and rollback practices for AI systems in production.

14. Emerging AI Technology Evaluation

– Stay informed of model, protocol, and platform developments.
– Assess the applicability and maturity of emerging AI capabilities for program goals.

Discipline 2: Program Management (33%)
Responsibility Actions

1. AI Use-Case Selection and Scoping

– Apply selection criteria including frequency, friction, data availability, and human-review requirements.
– Define a minimum viable feasible AI solution with clear boundaries.

2. AI Program Planning and Sequencing

– Sequence initiatives from pilot to production at scale.
– Balance the portfolio across quick wins, strategic bets, and foundational enablers.

3. Stage-Gate and Release Governance

– Define architecture, safety, security, and legal checkpoints for agentic delivery.
– Govern promotion of AI systems to production against readiness criteria.

4. Risk Management for Agentic
Programs

– Identify AI-specific risks, including autonomy, model behavior, and dependency risks.
– Maintain an agent inventory with clear ownership from the start of the program.

5. Regulatory Compliance Management

– Plan program obligations against the EU AI Act's phased timeline and classification scheme.
– Align program governance with NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 practices.

6. Vendor and Platform Management

– Manage vendor churn, deprecation risk, and platform exit strategies.
– Ensure contracts address protocol support, data handling, and model change management.

7. Performance Measurement

– Define KPI sets for productivity and revenue-adjacent AI use cases.
– Distinguish leading from lagging indicators and avoid vanity metrics.

8. Budgeting and Resource Allocation

– Budget appropriately across pilots, platform build-out, and run costs.
– Manage architecture debt and drive reuse across AI initiatives.

9. Quality and Evaluation Governance

– Enforce evaluation standards across AI deliverables.
– Monitor for model drift and quality regression through the lifecycle.

10. Documentation and Knowledge
Sharing

– Develop and maintain documentation for AI system decisions, risks, and compliance evidence.
– Facilitate lessons-learned reviews and knowledge sharing across AI initiatives.

11. Compliance and Risk Assessment

– Assess risks related to regulatory and compliance requirements.
– Ensure documentation meets standards. 

12. Closure and Transition
Management

– Plan for smooth transition post-program completion.
– Conduct lessons-learned reviews. 

Discipline 3: People (23%)
Responsibility Actions

1. Cross-Functional Translation

– Communicate effectively between architects, engineers, security, legal, data, and operations.
– Frame technical trade-offs so decision-makers can act on them.

2. Executive Communication

– Present AI recommendations, readouts, and rollout plans to executive audiences.
– Set realistic expectations by separating demonstrated capability from vendor hype.

3. Stakeholder Alignment

– Align business, IT, security, legal, and data owners on AI initiative goals.
– Establish RACI clarity across the AI program's decision rights.

4. Change Management and Adoption

– Plan enablement and communication for AI-augmented ways of working.
– Measure and drive adoption of AI capabilities across affected teams.

5. Team Enablement and Upskilling

– Assess AI skill gaps across program teams.

– Provide training pathways and resources to close capability gaps.

6. Responsible AI Leadership

– Model responsible AI practices in program decisions.

– Foster an environment where AI risks and concerns can be raised safely.

7. Human–AI Collaboration Design

– Define human-in-the-loop roles and responsibilities in agentic workflows.
– Address workforce concerns about agents constructively and transparently.

8. Conflict Resolution and Negotiation

– Resolve prioritization conflicts across competing AI demands.
– Negotiate autonomy boundaries and control requirements with stakeholders.